India’s faceless assessment regime — introduced through Section 144B of the Income-tax Act — is now in its fifth full year of operation. With the Income-tax Act 2025 in force from 1 April 2026 and the new e-filing portal cutting in alongside it, this is a good moment to take stock of how the regime actually works for taxpayers, what to expect when a notice arrives, and what the faceless appeals route looks like in practice.
The framework, in brief
Section 144B mandates that income-tax assessments be conducted in a faceless manner — without direct interface between the assessing officer and the assessee. The work is distributed across:
- National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC) — the central node that allocates cases to assessment units
- Assessment Units (AUs) — conduct the assessment, issue questionnaires, frame the draft order
- Verification Units (VUs) — do the on-the-ground verification (rare, for survey-type matters)
- Technical Units (TUs) — provide expert input on complex matters (transfer pricing, international tax, capital gains valuation)
- Review Units (RUs) — review the draft assessment order before finalisation
The assessee’s only interface is the e-filing portal. All notices are uploaded; all responses are submitted through the portal; the assessment order arrives in your inbox and on the portal dashboard.
What it means for a taxpayer in practice
The day-to-day reality of a faceless assessment is:
- Selection notice (Section 143(2)) — arrives via email and on the e-filing portal. You have 30 days to respond.
- Show-cause questionnaire — usually 4-8 questions, asking for specific documents, ledger reconciliations, third-party confirmations. Response window is typically 7-15 days.
- Iterative responses — the AU may issue follow-up questions as your responses raise sub-issues. Each round is on the portal.
- Draft assessment order — if the AU proposes to make any addition, you get a draft order with a chance to respond before it is finalised.
- Final order — signed digitally, served on the portal and via email.
Personal hearing has been operationalised through video conferencing. If you request a personal hearing on a contentious point, the AU must convene a video hearing — the right to be heard before an adverse order is preserved.
Where it works, and where it doesn’t
What works: the regime has materially compressed the time taken for routine assessments, removed the location bias (a Bengaluru taxpayer is no longer at a disadvantage if their case is being framed by an officer in another circle), and reduced the discretionary friction that used to accompany face-to-face proceedings. Documentation discipline at the taxpayer end has visibly improved.
What doesn’t: matters that benefit from real-time clarification (transfer pricing benchmarking debates, complex M&A transactions, intricate capital-gains structures) lose something when the iterative dialogue is reduced to written exchanges. Some draft orders get framed on misunderstandings of the facts that a 20-minute meeting would have cleared up. The video-conferencing safety valve helps, but the bias is towards written exchange.
The faceless appeals scheme
The Faceless Appeals Scheme, 2020 mirrors the assessment side: appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals) [CIT(A)] are now disposed faceless, with dynamic jurisdiction (the appeal isn’t tied to your geographic CIT(A) office). The carve-outs — appeals that go through the regular non-faceless route — are:
- Serious frauds and major tax-evasion cases
- Sensitive matters and search/seizure cases
- International taxation cases
- Black money matters under the Black Money Act
For everything else, the faceless appeals scheme is now standard.
The new portal — April 2026 onwards
Alongside the Income-tax Act 2025 coming into force on 1 April 2026, a renewed e-filing portal has been rolled out. The portal connects the new legislation to operating tools: the legal text of the Act, draft Rules 2026, all forms, computational helpers, e-verification, and post-filing services in a single environment. The interface for assessment notices and faceless responses sits within the same portal.
The e-verification options — Aadhaar OTP, EVC, net banking and DSC — remain. Taxpayers must e-verify within 30 days of submission, failing which the return is treated as invalid.
How to handle a faceless assessment well
- Read the questionnaire as a whole, not question-by-question. The AU’s line of inquiry tells you what theory of disallowance they’re working towards. Address the theory, not just the questions.
- Annex everything you cite. A response that says “please refer Ledger A” without attaching Ledger A loses you a round. Attach. Number the annexures. Index them.
- Use the personal hearing. If a draft order proposes a material addition, request a video hearing before it goes final. The right of audience is real; use it.
- Watch the timeline. Section 144B has hard timelines — orders not passed within them are unsustainable. If your assessment is approaching limitation, that is a defensive lever.
- Document the receipt timestamp. Faceless notices serve through the portal. Print or save the email/portal acknowledgement so you have a defensible “date of service” for response calculation.
- Don’t try to call the AU. The point of faceless is no informal contact. Use the portal channels exclusively; informal outreach risks compromising the response.
What we recommend
- Run a faceless-readiness check on your books: are your ledgers, supporting bills, party-wise reconciliations, and bank statements at a level where you can produce them inside a 7-day window when asked?
- For corporate clients, create an “assessment file” per AY at year-end — capital additions, related-party transactions, large vendor payouts, foreign remittances. This becomes the response material when an assessment notice lands.
- Save key evidence early. Bank statements, vendor PAN/GSTIN, party confirmations — these sometimes become harder to retrieve two years after the year-end.
- Engage a tax-litigation-experienced CA for any assessment with an addition risk above your comfort level. Faceless does not reduce the need for expert response framing.
- Track the limitation date for each pending assessment in your file. Section 144B’s timelines are a meaningful defence.
If you have a faceless assessment notice or appeal in hand and would like a partner to draft the response, write to us at [email protected].
Sources
Talk to a partner.
A 30-minute call with a partner — no deck, no follow-up email blasts. Just a read on how this applies to your facts.